After the creation of the new constitution, it is exactly one year since the state and representative assembly elections for the second fresh mandate have been completed. When there was a sign of the emergence of a new party challenging the old and established political parties in the elections scheduled for November 4 last year, there were comments on the established parties – ‘Sakkine or Sachhine?

‘ In response, the leaders said – ‘We have no choice but to be honest.’ In the election held in the middle of this question, the Congress, Maoists, United Socialists, and other parties allied and went to the election, while the UML also entered the election with a partial alliance with the RPR, Jaspa, and other parties.The new political party Rashtriya Swatantra Party (RASWPA) entered the elections alone and emerged as the fourth-largest party in the parliament. His emergence through the election was a shock to the old parties Nepali Congress became the first, UML became the second and Maoist Center became the third largest party. After the result of this election, a single majority government could not be formed, suddenly between the UML and the Maoist center, the chairman of the Maoists, became the prime minister after forming a coalition. But that equation could not last long.In the second week of February 2079, Prachanda finally joined the alliance with the Congress before the election and is currently leading the government. After Prachanda became the prime minister, the question of whether the old parties were to be ‘sucked or true’ became more complicated during the by-elections held at the beginning of 2080. However, the results of the elections held in Chitwan, Tanahun, and Bara did not make it clear that the parties were correct.Now, many people have forgotten the question of ‘Sackine or Sachhine?’ However, when analyzing the behavior of political parties, one cannot get any impression that they are correct. Instead, the comment that old and new parties are the same has become stronger.All the political parties seem to be progressive in their agenda. However, there does not seem to be any improvement in the bodies, leadership, and systems that implement the progressive agenda. Even though the established parties do not stop preaching that their agenda is progressive, in practice, they are indulging in archaic behavior is confirmed by the activities and working style, which is evident from the delay and controversy in the law-making that should be made regarding the implementation of federalism according to the constitution.Apart from that, the socialist front built by the power alliance can be taken as the basis for the socialism that the parties say and its basis. Even though a long time has passed since the formation of the Morcha, the Morcha has not been able to confirm any justification except to bake bread for the interests of power. Citizens are feeling that the instability, chaos, and misrule in the society are getting out of control. At this time, the so-called backward and regressive forces have started to assert themselves in different guises. It can be easily estimated that the ‘nine wrists’ neck of the parties. Even, the main opposition CPN-UML, which claims itself as the center of national politics, has been shocked because of one person Durga Prasai. The fact that the entire UML has to mobilize against Durga Prasai makes their position clear. Melting the nine wrists of the parties means that it will be difficult to solve the problem.However, CPN UML seniorsUML leader Ishwar Pokharel, who is also the vice-president, says that the question of ‘Sakkine or Sachine?’ is not relevant now in the case of UML. “Political parties who say they are the agents of change, they have no choice but to transform themselves according to the changed situation”, Pokharel said to Red Star News “Parties other than UML have not followed that eternal truth.Leader Pokharel claimed that the country’s situation is becoming critical due to the current power coalition. Pokharel said, “The purpose with which this alliance was formed was wrong”.Leader Agni Sapkota, who is also the spokesperson of the ruling party CPN-Maoist Center, alleged that although the new political parties talk about whether they are correct or not against the old parties, they are unclear about their ideas, principles, and action directions.”There is a reactionary expression about the shortcomings and errors of the old and established parties, whether they are true or not. Sapkota said, “but they never present their ideas, principles, political direction, strategy, tactics and its detailed plan to the public.”Sapkota also claimed that because of weak soil, the new ones cannot last for long. We are, we can. Apart from the fact that we do not live without a city, it seems that a spirit is expressed. But there is no ideological, political thing with reliable and political intelligence. That’s why it doesn’t seem like it will last long”, says spokesperson Sapkota.According to Pradeep Poudel, the leader of the ruling party Nepali Congress, there is no alternative to the parties. But for that, the party leadership needs to pay more attention. He also said that if two or four members of the party make mistakes, it cannot be said that the party will end.It does not mean that two or four leaders of the party can make mistakes. However, our leadership is not going in the right direction’, Paudel told Ratopati, ‘if the behavior of the leadership does not change and if he does not correct himself, that trend will end. If that happens, it can lead the party in the direction of tyranny.Therefore, in the process of correction, we should be able to say goodbye to that leadership.Poudel is dissatisfied that the parties that came to power have never shown seriousness towards the questions raised by the people.On the other hand, although the leaders of the old parties said that there is no alternative to reformation, the RSVP, which has come as a new power, has claimed that the established and so-called old parties are not moving in the direction of reformation. Parliamentarian Santosh Pariyar, who is also the chief whip of RSVP, said, “Even if we look at the practice of one year of parliament, we don’t think that they will be correct.”He claimed that both the government and parliament were ineffective in the past year and that they were not like the old parties.We are not like the old party. We cooperate in the Parliament for the benefit of the country and the people. We compete in elections. Pariyar says we cannot be called old-fashioned just because we are in dialogue with the old parties.UML Senior Vice President Ishwar Pokharel, Maoist Spokesperson Agni Sapkota, Congress Leader Pradeep Paudel and RSVP Chief Whip Santosh Periyar, what parties were wronged?? Are they the same? has asked that. Here is the statement of the leaders -Can’t even think of anything that can be done: Ishwar Pokharel, senior vice president of CPN-UMLPolitical parties, based on their qualifications, based on awareness, and the basis of analysis of the situation, think only what is possible and not what is true, they do not think what is possible. In the politics of Nepal, even if Solodolo questions UML, this question is not relevant in the case of UML. Because we believe in continuous movement and understanding the change in the situation, we move forward, we are growing.We are moving forward in organizing ideas, organization, and programs. But one thing is clear: whether the parties should survive or not, this is permanent. Therefore, the political parties who claim to be the agents of change have no choice but to transform themselves according to the changed situation. Analysis shows that the parties have not followed that eternal truth. It is seen.The present ruling coalition was formed with the purpose, that purpose was wrong.This coalition was formed to run the country in the absence of UML by holding a massive anti-UML front to finish UML. Which was not guided by any theory or program, the results are now being seen. This alliance has been created with corrupt and conspiratorial intentions. There is no purpose behind this except to ban UML. We are facing negative consequences because of the good intentions, the alliance is not formed for the benefit of the people of the country.Where did the issue of national self-respect reach and where is it falling now? How was the country’s economy and where is it going now? As the social harmony is becoming stronger, efforts are being made to destroy it now. The issue of national independence and self-respect is getting weaker day by day. The services that the people should get are weakening and impunity has increased. It is not governance that has increased misrule.If the country continues at this pace for another four years, the country will go towards misfortune and disaster and we all will have to bear the loss. What is the main party Nepali Congress thinking about this? Will the Maoists continue to enjoy such games? It is important to think. Even amid this adversity, it is necessary for the forces that are in favor of national self-respect independence, and universality to be united, CPN-UML is working to organize ideas, organization, and activities to strengthen itself. Only UML can get the country out of this crisis.There is no such thing as correctness in politics: Agni Sapkota, Spokesperson Maoist CenterOne thing is that the old political parties should seriously review themselves. That review has begun. Now there will be two sides. A national vision should be created between the proponents of change and the proponents of progress.Second, internal democracy between the parties should be strengthened. Due to the lack of internal democracy, there is no development of ideas. Now there is no discussion of ideas within the party. What is the confusion spread by the philanthropists now that the people do not want principles? He said that he did not want the idea. That is wrong. Thought is the way forward. If the political parties cannot develop their ideas, their justification ends.In my opinion, political parties should strengthen internal democracy. Political parties should take initiatives and programs. Due to the geopolitical situation in Nepal, a review has started between the political parties. This is a positive and pleasant thing. It is not for show, but it should be taken seriously. Weaknesses and errors should be corrected so that people can be trusted. I believe that the people responded. However, the people are not in favor of finding an alternative to democracy. However, they want advanced democracy. It seems that all the parties have ignored the people. The parties should take the questions raised by them seriously. Now, not by speech, we should give one answer by behavior.If the party leading the government and the related parties are to go ahead after a serious review, the patriotism will not last for long. In summary, the preamble of the constitution says democratic socialism. Socialism-oriented state system. It’s not just for writing, it has to be put into practice.Now it’s time for another budget. Everything financiallyCome and join. Now people say that the system has changed, but the situation has not changed. The parties should set an agenda that directly affects the people in the budget. For that, jobs should be created. Let’s start giving employment to at least one person in a family. This will reduce poverty. When poverty is removed, the standard of living of the people rises. Together, society progresses. Now the gap between the rich and the poor has widened. Socialism means justice and equality. A concrete policy should come from all parties. What is education policy? What is health policy? What is employment policy? What is the market policy? All these things must come. There is no such thing as truth in politics. It is a continuous process.From the review meeting held at Singha Durbar last week, serious attention has been drawn to the questions raised by the people and the opposition. Political parties should develop themselves with honesty and respect from within.We are moving in the right direction: Pradeep Paudel, leader of Nepali Congress does not mean that two or four leaders of the party can make mistakes. However, the leadership is not going in the right direction.If the leader’s behavior does not change and he does not correct himself, that trend will end. If that happens, it can lead the party in the direction of tyranny. Therefore, in the process of correction, we should be able to say goodbye to that leadership.After coming to power, questions arise. Those in power have never shown any seriousness towards those questions. Those questions were taken very casually. Questions were raised before. The continuation of raising questions continued even in this one year. People want no place to raise questions. They want the questions raised not to go unanswered. However, here it is not just an answer to the question, it is only a matter of creating a question. People have not found the answers to the earlier questions. It became a situation of not moving towards the correct path after realizing the previous shortcomings. As a result, people’s criticism of the system itself started to increase.They were trying to fish in murky waters by raising questions about this arrangement. It seems that the legalists are doing the job of obstructing that effort. The government is in favor of delivering to the people didn’t realize that. From the point of view that parties have changed culture, attitude, and behavior, it is not a big achievement. However, that is not the fault of the system. It happened because of the weakness of some people who had the opportunity to lead within the system.If they fail, we will take the lead: Santosh Pariyar, Chief Whip, RSP With our presence, the disharmony within the old parties will also be resolved. All the political parties in Nepal will give way to the development of the country. We thought that the country would be better together. At that time, we said that it would be true now. However, even now there has been no improvement in the political condition and tendency of the old parties. If they were true, we would all build the country together, and bring prosperity and peace to the country.If they are not correct, we will have to take the lead. Yesterday there were mistakes everywhere. They have not reached the place where that is true. Even if you look at the practice of one year of Parliament, they are correct I don’t think it will happen. The government and parliament are not effective. We are not like the old party. We cooperate in the Parliament for the benefit of the country and the people. We compete in elections. We cannot be called old just because we are in dialogue with old parties. Our public opinion is new. We are completely different in terms of ideas, programs, and party activities. The presentation of our parliament and our activities also show that we are different from the old parties.